At about 11:41am PST today (an hour ago), a 5.4 earthquake hit east of Los Angeles. Don’t be fooled by the link, I didn’t hear about it from CNN. The ‘news’ mediums that broke the story first were Twitter and Ustream.tv. I initially heard about it on Alejandro Reyes’ live Ustream channel as viewers in the area commented as it was happening.

Ustream.tv Live EQ Comments

I went over to Summize…err, Twitter Search, to hear more news and see how everyone was doing out there. Within a half hour of when the news first broke, there were already over 4,000 tweets about the event (and Twitter didn’t go down!). Luckily, no one had reported any injuries or structural damage; just a few things knocked over.

What I’m getting to here is that I didn’t go to CNN.com or turned the TV on, this event happened ‘before my eyes’ on the Web through these real-time mediums. I was able to get a breaking story that all the major news channels are now covering, before those very major news channels. For a user who utilizes these tools on a daily basis, I’ve turned less and less to actual news mediums for breaking news or stories and in a sense, let the stories come to me through Twitter and other networks.

Does this spell doom for traditional news avenues? Obviously not. It just shows the opportunity for both social networks and news sites. Social networks are reaping the benefits as their users are communicating with their network throughout the day, thus creating a chain reaction of messages when national and even global events occur. They haven’t necessarily shunned the news media but CNN, FOX, etc. are not the breaking news centers that they once used to be, as they’re becoming more of a secondary source. But how can the news media take this and flip it into a positive? Well, they’ll have to get (and have been) more active with Twitter and other networks to monitor such internet ‘phenomenon’. Its more so a form of industry monitoring/management where news sites can essentially be on top of reporting new stories or in this case, natural disasters, through the use of these networks.

I admit, this opportunity is at small proportions right now, but do you think we will see the rise of social journalism in the near future? What do you think about the evolution of social media forming into a breaking news center? Do you see traditional news eventually giving social networks more weight and credibility as a source for their stories?

Let me know your thoughts!

Update: A continued Plurk discussion on this topic.

4 comments filed under Social Media

Spread the word or voice your own through the options below!

digg it | stumbleupon | del.icio.us | sphinn | mixx | leave a comment

Enjoyed this post? Be sure to subscribe to our RSS Feed!

4 responses to “Is Social Media Replacing News Media?”

feed for this entrytrackback address
  1. Eric 1

    posted on July 29th, 2008 - 8:04 pm

    I first heard about it on Plurk

  2. Mike Driehorst 2

    posted on July 30th, 2008 - 7:42 am

    I think citizen journalism (social journalism, as you called it) does have a place. And, for alerts about events social media is definitely the fastest (assuming the alerts are accurate) because there’s no review process as there is in traditional journalism. You just type and send.

    But, the real details of a story will be from traditional media, particularly from print and the print sites. No matter what you say, you can’t get real, in-depth reporting via broadcast. It’s only in writing (whether print or web).

    -Mike

  3. Jason Peck 3

    posted on July 30th, 2008 - 8:43 am

    I first heard about it through a phone call. I think news always spreads via word of mouth but sometimes it spreads more quickly via mainstream media. However, in some cases news spreads faster via word of mouth now due to social media sites/tools/services, and I think this trend will definitely continue.

  4. Sonny Gill 4

    posted on July 30th, 2008 - 8:35 pm

    @Eric - Yup, Plurk was fairly up on the news as well.

    @Mike Driehorst - Right. We’ll all be looking for the juicy tidbits of all these stories but the excitement definitely lies in the initial breaking point of these stories; to be a part of that, first hand, is definitely an experience.

    @Jason Peck - Definitely shows the power of WOM!

`